Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Hall v. Deck-Brown et al
as 5:2020cv00559
Defendant:
M O Glen, John Doe VI, John Doe I and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Darnell Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARPIO RIERA v. KELLY et al
as 1:2017cv00296
Defendant:
JOHN FRANCIS KELLY , THOMAS D. HOMAN , ERIC FARRAR and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN RAFAEL CARPIO RIERA
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252
HOOD v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC et al
as 1:2016cv00998
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOOD
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , RASIER, LLC. and JOHN DOES I-V
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Todd v. White et al
as 1:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Levon Todd
Defendant:
Susan White, Mike Slagle, Norma Melton and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton, et al v. City of Raleigh, et al
as 5:2015cv00349
Plaintiff:
Isaac Brennan Horton, IV and Omeze Nwankwo
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, John Doe, I, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks et al v. Doughtie et al
as 2:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Linc Oshea Brooks and April Gladney Brooks
Defendant:
J. D. Doughtie, Walter Kevin Duprey, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wardrett v. City of Rocky Mount North Carolina, et al
as 5:2014cv00854
Plaintiff:
Caleb Wardrett
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe II, John Doe III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steele v. Doe
as 5:2014ct03095
Plaintiff:
Henry J. Steele
Defendant:
John Doe, I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Advocacy for Consumer Rights, LLC v. Rhode, et al
as 5:2014cv00215
Plaintiff:
The Advocacy for Consumer Rights, LLC
Defendant:
Steve Rhode, John Does I-X, ABC Partnerships I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carawan v. Daniels et al
as 5:2013ct03108
Plaintiff:
William C. Carawan, Jr.
Defendant:
Dennis Daniels, Nurse Magana, C/O Foote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
