Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13,702
Doe #1 MKC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff: John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff: John Doe #066
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2024cv02304
Not Yet Classified: Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff: Steve Woods
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. doing business as The Home Depot and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Handsome v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11230
Plaintiff: Marwan Hasan Handsome
Defendant: John Doe
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff: Mack Jones
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Warren Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv11220
Plaintiff: Rodney Wright
Defendant: Warren Police Department, Jacob Owen, Nicholas Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
NEW v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv02253
Plaintiff: JOELLE NEW
Defendant: The City of Columbus, Officer John Doe #1 and Officer John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Matthews v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff: Louis R. Matthews
Defendant: USP McCreary, Colette Peters, John Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff: Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00560
Petitioner: Toby Whitaker
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?