Cases 1 - 10 of 28
James Ross v. Tyler Blewett, et al
as 23-35298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
TYLER BLEWETT, KEN JESKE, SHAWN HAYWOOD and others
Jama v. Ball et al
as 3:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Hamza Mohammed Jama
Defendant:
(FNU) Ball, Christopher Randall, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thomas Sliwinski v. Brian Gootkin, et al
as 23-35074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS EMIL SLIWINSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN GOOTKIN, PAUL REES, BILTOFT, Lt. and others
Lance Williams v. Navarro, et al
as 22-55974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
NAVARRO, Correction Officer (3rd Watch Control Tower), E. ESTRADA, Correctional Officer, J. MEJIA, Correctional Officer and others
Flournoy v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv05971
Plaintiff:
James Henry Flournoy, Jr.
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc., Alameda County Board of Supervisors, Pleasanton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Ross v. Tyler Blewett, et al
as 22-35500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
TYLER BLEWETT, RUMSEY, Captain, KEN JESKE and others
Lance Williams v. Navarro, et al
as 22-55426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
NAVARRO, Correction Officer (3rd Watch Control Tower), E. ESTRADA, Correctional Officer, J. MEJIA, Correctional Officer and others
Sliwinski v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2021cv00051
Plaintiff:
Thomas Emil Sliwinski
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Paul Rees, Lt. Biltoft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv00857
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Destiny Elliott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hertzog v. Dobson et al
as 2:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Spokane Eye Clinic, John Does 1-2, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
George Philip Hertzog, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
