Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bibbs v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Bibbs
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Timothy Fitzpatrick and John Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bibbs v. Collier et al
as 3:2023cv02596
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Bibbs
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Timothy Fitzpatrick and John Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Lexington County, SC
as 20-6939
Defendant / Appellee:
ALBERT JOHN DOOLEY, III, in his official capacity as the Associate Chief Judge for Administrative Purposes of the Summary Courts in Lexington County, ROBERT MADSEN, in his official capacity as the Circuit Public Defender for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of South Carolina, BRYAN KOON, in his official capacity as the Lexington County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMY MARIE PALACIOS, RAYMOND WRIGHT, JR., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, SASHA MONIQUE DARBY and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Dooley v. Thornes et al
as 2:2019cv02012
Defendant:
Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa and Harun Hasseim Thornes
Plaintiff:
John Dooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aiello et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11345
Plaintiff:
Brian Hawkins, Modesto Orozco III, Andre Morisse Von and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05588
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dooley v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
Myra Brown Dooley and John Dooley
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
