Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jones v. Finnegan et al
as 3:2022cv05335
Plaintiff:
Monroe Jones
Defendant:
John Finnegan and Edward Poneroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gogyan v. Finnegan et al
as 2:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
Aleksandre Gogyan
Defendant:
John Finnegan and Truly Nolen of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ealy v. Finnegan
as 2:2021cv14123
Plaintiff:
Johnny A. Ealy
Defendant:
John Finnegan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finnegan v. Bernhardt
as 1:2020cv12175
Defendant:
David Bernhardt
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party John Finnegan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Finnegan et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00901
Defendant:
Arizant Healthcare Inc. and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Erin Finnegan and John Finnegan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
John Finnegan, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
as 17-10676
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN FINNEGAN and JOAN FINNEGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Riser et al v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2016cv03465
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Jack Riser , Sharon Riser , John F Pelikan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shaun Foudy, et al v. Indian River County Sheriff's, et al
as 15-14646
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAUN FOUDY and TONI FOUDY
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SHERIFF DERYL LOAR, in his official capacity as the Sheriff of the Indian River County Sheriff's Office and in his individual capacity, DAVID BAILEY, individually and others
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
