Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant:
RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant:
RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
JAMES v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL JOHN JAMES
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, ANTHONEY CANTILLO and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1959
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Respondent:
ANTHONY J. HARDY, ZACHARY SWAIN, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1639
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and JACOB ZERNICKI
Respondent:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ANTHONY J. HARDY, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Newby et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11718
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
John Newby and Frances Lietemeyer Newby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Bredsen et al
as 2:2010cv02950
Plaintiff:
Milton Leon Simpson
Defendant:
Phil Bredsen, William Oldham, Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanks v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2009cv02353
Plaintiff:
Quincey LeShun Blanks
Defendant:
Mark Luttrell, Swift, John Newby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Fishback v. Department of Public Safety an
as 08-8128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. FISHBACK
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Unknown Employees, Former Employees, Contractors, Former Contractors Thereof, in their individual and official capacities, OFFICE INMATE HEALTH SERVICES, Unknown Employees, Former Employees, Contractors, Former Contractors thereof, in their individual and official capacities, JOHN A. ROWLEY, Acting Deputy Commissioner for the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, in his individual and official capacities and others
John Fishback v. Department of Public Safety an
as 08-6815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. FISHBACK
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Unknown Employees, Former Employees, Contractors, Former Contractors Thereof, in their individual and official capacities, OFFICE INMATE HEALTH SERVICES, Unknown Employees, Former Employees, Contractors, Former Contractors thereof, in their individual and official capacities, JOHN A. ROWLEY, Acting Deputy Commissioner for the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, in his individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
