Cases 1 - 10 of 20
John Smiley, Sr. v. City of Memphis, TN, et al
as 25-6174
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMILEY, SR.
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, TN, CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN, CITY OF MEMPHIS, TN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
John Smiley v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv01127
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
John Smiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smiley v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2024cv01512
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Memphis Police Department, City of Nashville and others
Plaintiff:
John Smiley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plimpton v. Bank of Jackson Hole et al
as 0:2021cv00050
Defendant:
John Smiley, Holland & Hart, LLP, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Plimpton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00205
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00204
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Richard Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole, et al
as 20-16637
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY BARNEY, JOHN SMILEY, LINDQUIST & VENNUM, LLP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD FRIEDMAN
Richard Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole, et al
as 20-16026
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY BARNEY, JOHN SMILEY, LINDQUIST & VENNUM, LLP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD FRIEDMAN
Plimpton v. Bank of Jackson Hole et al
as 3:2020cv00323
Defendant:
John Smiley, Robert M. Lane, Holland & Hart, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Plimpton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson Hole Bank Fraud Litigation Trust v. Bank of Jackson Hole et al
as 2:2019cv01054
Defendant:
Colleen Lane, John Smiley, Charles Hingle and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson Hole Bank Fraud Litigation Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
