Cases 61 - 70 of 107
McCollor v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2015cv00032
Petitioner:
John William McCollor
Defendant:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCollor v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv01655
Petitioner:
John William McCollor
Defendant:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kervin et al v. Supreme Service & Specialty Company, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01172
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kervin , Nicholas Ardoin , Aubrey Lee Castille, Jr and others
Defendant:
Supreme Service & Specialty Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Connor v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2015cv00608
Plaintiff:
John William Connor
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza et al v. Jackson Public School District et al
as 3:2015cv00158
Defendant:
Jackson Public School District, Eric Greene, Officer Dood and others
Plaintiff:
Garza, Mary Rose Short, Sarah Durling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00629
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Leon John Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Finney v. MDOC-SMCI
as 1:2014cv00358
Plaintiff:
John William Finney
Defendant:
MDOC-SMCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Health Assurance Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01045
Plaintiff:
John William Barrett
Defendant:
Health Assurance Inc. , Carl Reddix , Carl Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Health Assurance Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
John William Barrett
Defendant:
Health Assurance Inc., Carl Reddix, Carl Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. John Sturm
as 13-10929
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM STURM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
