Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cin Dale 3 et al v. Peoples Bank Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Cin Dale 3, John Wright 1&2, Miller and others
Defendant:
Peoples Bank Corp., Kim Lighthall and John or Jane Doe Bank Employees 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02719
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wright v. Metz et al
as 8:2018cv00886
Plaintiff:
John Wright
Defendant:
Marvin Metz and Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Wexford Health Source, Inc.
as 8:2017cv03557
Plaintiff:
John Wright
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Webb et al
as 8:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
John Wright
Defendant:
Wayne Webb, Frank Bishop, David Wolford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAZ-LEMUS et al v. PRO TEMP SERVICES, INC. et al
as 8:2015cv03945
Plaintiff:
OLVIN NOE DIAZ-LEMUS , JORGE ALBERTO FUENTES VASQUEZ and JOSE ALBERTO HERNANDEZ CEDILLOS
Defendant:
PRO TEMP SERVICES, INC., J.W. TRUCKING, INC., NATIONAL DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Diaz-Lemus et al v. Pro Temp Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03945
Plaintiff:
Olvin Noe Diaz-Lemus , Jorge Alberto Fuentes Vasquez and Jose Alberto Hernandez Cedillos
Defendant:
Pro Temp Services, Inc., J.W. Trucking, Inc., National Delivery Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wright et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32180
Plaintiff:
Mendy Wright and John Wright
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Charleston, City of et al
as 2:2011cv01648
Plaintiff:
John Wright
Defendant:
Charleston, City of, NFN Lucas and Charleston County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Warden
as 1:2008cv02105
Plaintiff:
John Wright
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
