Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04543
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Christopher John Wright, Esq.In re: Christopher John Wright, Esq.
as 20-80036
Respondent:
In re: CHRISTOPHER JOHN WRIGHT, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: May 21, 1996
Wright v. Lane County Parole and Probation et al
as 6:2019cv01661
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Lane County, Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory John Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sir Giorgio Clardy v. Tracie McFarlane, et al
as 19-35530
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, RONNIE FOSS, CRAIG PRINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIR GIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY
Clardy v. McFarlane et al
as 6:2018cv02175
Defendant:
Jane Wagner, Craig Prins, Kelly Rath and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Wright v. Dr. Keller, et al.
as 2:2018cv02308
Defendant:
Dr. Harley Vanderstreck, Dr. Keller and Johnson
Plaintiff:
Kingsley La-John Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingsley La-John Wright v. Dr. Keller et al
as 2:2018cv06898
Defendant:
Dr. Harley Vanderstreck, Dr. Keller and Dr. Johnson
Plaintiff:
Kingsley La-John Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saloum v. Wright et al
as 3:2018cv00612
Defendant:
Paul Binford, City of Tillamook, William Bryon Porter and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Norman Saloum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wright v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02255
Plaintiff:
John Wright
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker et al v. Wright
as 1:2012cv00543
Counter Defendant:
Byron J Parker
Defendant:
Boise Garage Door LLC and John Wright
Plaintiff:
Ryon Parker and Byron J Parker doing business as Sunrise Garage Door
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
