Cases 21 - 30 of 601
PONDER v. DOES et al
as 5:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH D PONDER
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEPPERS v. DOES
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Peppers
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. REED et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
AMANDA REED, DONALD CONEWAY, SR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones-Williams v. Missouri State et al
as 4:2023cv00947
Defendant:
Beverly Barnett Parker, Missouri State, County of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff:
Rozina Rhonda Jones-Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Tony Reed
Respondent:
USP McCreary, Dr. Parsons, Dr. R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Due v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2023cv02431
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
Faisal Vakil Ahmed, Mary A Noland, Syed Fateh Hyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lamar Casleberry v. David Ekwinife, et al
as 23-12384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR DESHAWN CASLEBERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID EKWINIFE, BALDWIN SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN, BALDWIN STATE PRISON and others
MITCHELL v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
KERRY S MITCHELL
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, WARDEN CHARLES MIMMS, LIEUTENANT ROSEVELT GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEPPERS v. DOES
as 5:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PEPPERS
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REH FAC ET
as 5:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REH FAC ET and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
