Cases 21 - 30 of 143
Jacobs v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2019cv00286
Defendant:
Warden, USP McCreary, USP McCreary and John or Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moler v. Lawson et al
as 6:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Christopher Mabe, Ms. J. Free and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. Doe
as 5:2019cv00115
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Dylan T. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jointer v. Franklin County Regional Jail et al
as 3:2018cv00063
Defendant:
Franklin County Regional Jail, John or Jane Does, Lt. D. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bey and Jerome Jointer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stamper v. Family Dollar, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00611
Defendant:
Family Dollar, Inc., John or Jane Doe and Family Dollar Stores of Kentucky, LP
Plaintiff:
Louemma Stamper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tracey v. Wayne County Detention Center et al
as 6:2018cv00300
Plaintiff:
Adam W. Tracey
Defendant:
Jailer Harvey Shearer, Sheriff Tim Catron, John and Jane Does 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracey v. Wayne Co. Detention Center et al
as 6:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
Adam W. Tracey
Defendant:
Harvey Shearer, John or Jane Does, Wayne Co. Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sears v. Pulaski County Detention Center et al
as 6:2018cv00234
Defendant:
Amy Parsons, Corhealth Solutions, LLC, Officer Hunter Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Edward Sears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moose v. USA et al
as 6:2018cv00272
Defendant:
J.E. Krueger, Mr. Fardel, John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thirplus Moose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Fiorito v. Dr. Love et al
as 0:2018cv00099
Defendant:
Ian Connors, Dr. Thomas Love, Dr. Peikar and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
