Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Chambers v. Rice County et al
as 0:2021cv02314
Plaintiff:
Kayshawn Chambers
Defendant:
Rice County, Sheriff Troy Dunn, Rice County Jail Nurse Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehta v. Angell Energy, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv02631
Defendant:
Angell Energy, LLC, Timothy Krieger, ABC Corps 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Neil Mehta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manos et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2018cv00427
Plaintiff:
Theodore Manos and Tatyana Manos
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mark S. Inch, L. LaRiva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv00282
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv00278
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv00271
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Gamble et al v. Minnesota State-Operated Services et al
as 0:2016cv02720
Plaintiff:
David Le Roy Gamble, Jr., Cyrus Patrick Gladden, II, David James Jannetta and others
Defendant:
Minnesota State-Operated Services , Minnesota State Industries , Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sapp v. City of Baudette et al
as 0:2015cv01589
Plaintiff:
Richard Sapp
Defendant:
City of Baudette , City of Big Lake , City of Brooklyn Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. City of Bloomington et al
as 0:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Tase Brown , Melonie Scott and Ashley Scott
Defendant:
Bloomington, City of, Matthew George, Carolyn Kne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berenguer v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2014cv04972
Plaintiff:
Juan Bautista Berenguer
Defendant:
Anoka County, City of Bloomington, City of Brooklyn Park and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
