Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Bertus v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2026cv00162
Plaintiff:
Elshell D Bertus
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Austin L. Garrett, QCHC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Matthew Miller v. Hamilton County, TN, et al
as 26-5465
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DREW MILLER
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, TN, JIM HAMMOND, Individually and in his Official capacity as Hamilton County Sheriff, QCHC OF TENNESSEE, PLLC and others
Freeman v. Quality Corrections Medical Center
as 1:2025cv00320
Plaintiff:
Ramie Renee Freeman
Defendant:
Quality Corrections Medical Center and Dr. Johnny Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Burns et al
as 3:2025cv00776
Plaintiff:
Barry Payne, Jr.
Defendant:
Blake Burns, Joshua Phillips, Cherokee Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oltmer v. Colbert County Alabama et al
as 3:2025cv00765
Plaintiff:
Barret Oltmer
Defendant:
Colbert County Alabama, Frank Williamson, Eric Bllentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2025cv00085
Plaintiff:
Stacey Williams
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Austin Garrett, Shaun Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Srofe et al v. Hamilton County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00359
Defendant:
Kara Case, John Does (Unknown QCHC Medical Staff), Brent Stone and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Luz Srofe and David Christian Srofe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilson v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Defendant:
Fictitious Persons 1-50, Sevier County, Tennessee, QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cainan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Toney v. QCHC Inc et al
as 5:2024cv01470
Plaintiff:
Clifford Toney
Defendant:
QCHC Inc and Johnny Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
