Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21538
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ANTHONY PARKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Jonathan Reid
as 23-10619
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN ANTHONY REID
Reid v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00604
Petitioner:
Jonathan Anthony Reid
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Samuel Anthony, Jr. v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1111
Petitioner:
SAMUEL JONATHAN ANTHONY, JR.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
USA v. Jonathan Reid
as 21-13708
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN ANTHONY REID
Torres v. Coffee et al
as 1:2021cv00157
Defendant:
FNU Coffee, FNU Ingram and Ben Carver
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Torres v. Nathan Ball
as 21-6447
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN BALL, Sergeant, Buncombe County Sheriff Office, individual capacity, TIMOTHY R. TAYLOR, Deputy, Buncombe County Sheriff Office, individual capacity and DANE R. ONDERDONK, Deputy, Buncombe County Sheriff Office, individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ANTHONY LEE TORRES
Torres v. Ishee, et al
as 1:2021cv00068
Defendant:
Mark Ervin, Greg Swink, FNU Bullis and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zamberlin v. Saul
as 1:2020cv07381
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Zamberlin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
