Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bruce v. Worcester Regional Transit Authority, et al
as 21-1300
Defendant:
JAMES PARKER, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID TRABUCCO, in his individual and official capacity, JONATHAN CHURCH, in his individual and official capacity, WORCESTER REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER BRUCE
Plaintiff:
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION
Bruce v. Worcester Regional Transit Authority, et al
as 21-1293
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL MASS TRANSIT MANAGEMENT, INC., JAMES PARKER, in his individual and official capacity, DAVID TRABUCCO, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BRUCE
Mason v. Worcester Regional Transit Authority (WRTA) et al
as 4:2018cv40202
Defendant:
Kenneth Kephart, David Trabucco, James Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Mason, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bruce et al v. Worcester Regional Transit Authority et al
as 4:2018cv40037
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bruce and Amalgamated Transit Union
Defendant:
Worcester Regional Transit Authority, Central Mass Transit Management, Inc., David Trabucco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omnicomm Corporation v. AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al
as 13-12361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMNICOMM CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, JONATHAN CHURCH and DANTE MARTIN
Omnicomm Corporation v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2011cv04264
Plaintiff:
Omnicomm Corporation
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, Jonathan Church and Dante Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eller v. Kaufman et al
as 3:2011cv00401
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Eller
Defendant:
Gary Kaufman , Keith Lovin , Keith Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Eller v. Kaufman et al
as 2:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Eller
Defendant:
Gary Kaufman , Keith Lovin , Keith Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
