Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Nicholas et al v. Smith & Currie Motor Company et al
as 2:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
Robert Nicholas , Dennis Jones , Michael Grady and others
Defendant:
Smith & Currie Motor Company, Englewood Ford LLC and Douglas W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McDaniel v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 6:2010cv06143
Plaintiff:
Scott A. McDaniel
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, ReconTrust Company, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jackson v. Rock
as 1:2010cv02528
Petitioner:
Jonathan Jackson
Respondent:
Superintendent D. Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ratcliff et al v. CMH Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01307
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ratcliff , Felicha Whitlock , Heather Trimble and others
Defendant:
CMH Manufacturing, Inc., Clayton Homes, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guy et al v. Keystone RV Company et al
as 2:2009cv07817
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company and Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Guy, Cassandra Guy, Cassandra Guy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2009cv01785
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jackson
Defendant:
B. Sullivan, Robert L. Ayers, Jr and V. Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Jackson
as 09-1107
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN JACKSON
Jackson v. Conway
as 1:2008cv04732
Petitioner:
Jonathan Jackson
Respondent:
Conway
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02350
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jackson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jackson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv04503
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jackson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
