Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Walker v. Middle River Regional Jail et al
as 7:2025cv00046
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Travis Walker
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail, Middle River Regional Jail Authority, Management and Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Central Virginia Regional Jail et al
as 7:2025cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Travis Walker
Defendant:
Central Virginia Regional Jail, Management and Staff, Central Virginia Regional Jail or Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Jonathan Travis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GALLIMORE v. EMERALD COAST SUBS LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00893
Plaintiff:
STACEY GALLIMORE
Defendant:
EMERALD COAST SUBS, LLC, EMERALD COAST SUBS II, LLC, EMERALD COAST SUBS III, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
GALLIMORE v. EMERALD COAST SUBS VI, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00892
Plaintiff:
STACEY GALLIMORE
Defendant:
EMERALD COAST SUBS VI, LLC and JONATHAN TRAVIS BROWN
Marlowe v. LeBlanc
as 20-30738
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan Travis, Chermaine Brown, Sergeant, James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Christopher Marlowe
Christopher Marlowe v. James LeBlanc, Secretary, et al
as 20-30276
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN TRAVIS, CHERMAINE BROWN, Sergeant, POLLY SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER MARLOWE
SHIPMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv39420
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TRAVIS SHIPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00531
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
