Cases 31 - 40 of 8,987
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05252
Plaintiff:
Mark C Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gamboa-Molina #227424 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Armando Gamboa-Molina
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona Board of Executive Clemency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redeaux et al v. Wise et al
as 3:2024cv01979
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Redeaux, Andrea Smith and Pamela Jones
Defendant:
Noel Wise, Rebekah Evenson, Sarah Standard-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe A. Taylor-El et al v. Leanna Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv02611
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Taylor-El and Darrick L. Jones-Bey
Defendant:
Leanna Lundy, Erica Lake, J. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Dunsmore v. Jones, et al.
as 24-1907
Petitioner:
DARRYL DUNSMORE
Respondent:
GENA JONES, Acting Warden at the California Health Care Facility and ROBERT BONTA
(PS) John-Reif v. Gray et al
as 2:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Daniel John-Reif
Defendant:
Ryan Gray, Sabrina Buis, Todd Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Anthony K Jones
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
