Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv14472
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv14473
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04649
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03217
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03013
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rivera Colon v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv07159
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Plaintiff:
Jose Rivera Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv07099
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04326
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Darnell v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2026cv13026
Defendant:
And Does 1 Through 50, Officer Aguilar, Fred Leroy Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Saleta Darnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Torres et al v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE et al
as 5:2026cv06632
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 20 inclusive,, GAGE MACINTYRE and COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Plaintiff:
JOSE CUENCA and Ada Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
