Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Phillip Okin v. AT&T Corp, et al
as 21-2469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP OKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T CORP, JUDGE JOSE L LINARES, JUDGE SUSAN D WIGENTON and others
Linares-Tabora v. Warden
as 5:2021cv00350
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Jose Efrain Linares-Tabora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OKIN v. AT&T CORP. et al
as 3:2021cv12651
Defendant:
AT&T CORP., JUDGE SUSAN D. WIGENTON, JUDGE ESTER SALAS and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP OKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OKIN v. AT&T CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv12651
Defendant:
AT&T CORP., Judge Susan D Wigenton, Judge Stanley R Chesler and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP OKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawrence Crawford, et al v. Jose Linares
as 21-1330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YAHYA MUQUIT and LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF JOSE L LINARES
Terrence P. Collingsworth, et al v. Drummond Company, Inc., et al
as 20-7058
Defendant / Appellee:
Jose Miguel Linares, Alfredo Araujo Castro, Itochu Coal Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albert Van Bilderbeek, Ivan Otero Mendoza and Terrence P. Collingsworth
Rodriguez et al v. Romero et al
as 2:2019cv05057
Plaintiff:
Oscar Gonzalez, Santiago Barragan, Cristian Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
APJ Contracting, Inc. and Juan Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COLLINGSWORTH et al v. DRUMMOND COMPANY INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01263
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, DRUMMOND COMPANY INCORPORATED, ALFREDO ARAUJO CASTRO and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN OTERO MENDOZA, TERRENCE P. COLLINGSWORTH and ALBERT VAN BILDERBEEK
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Linares v. Nielsen et al
as 4:2019cv00027
Defendant:
Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Mark T Siegl and Lee F. Cissna
Plaintiff:
Jose Javier Linares
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
RADIN v. LINARES
as 3:2018cv09956
Plaintiff:
LIDYA RADIN
Defendant:
JOSE L. LINARES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
