Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Jose Contreras-Ortiz v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3271
Petitioner:
JOSE J. CONTRERAS-ORTIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Tenezaca et al v. 808 Lex Restaurant, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv08545
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Tenezaca, Nelson Nacipucha, Renan Zamora-Flores and others
Defendant:
808 Lex Restaurant, LLC doing business as Il Gradino Restaurant, Terrence Lowenberg and Todd Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06501
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HERNANDEZ CONTRERAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05447
Plaintiff:
JOSE HERNANDEZ CONTRERAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KONO v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04684
Plaintiff:
CASEY KONO, DAVID VELASQUEZ, JONATHAN GRIFFITH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Contreras v. Key
as 4:2023cv05011
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Contreras
Respondent:
James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Fuentes v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1165
Petitioner:
FRANK EDGARDO PALACIO FUENTES, a/k/a Francis Edgardo Palacios Fuentes, a/k/a Jose Antonio Rivera-Adame, a/k/a Jose Luis Estrada-Contreas, a/k/a Jose Alfredo Contreras-Salinas
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
USA v. Jose Zuniga-Contreras
as 21-10339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ZUNIGA-CONTRERAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
