Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Lozano v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.
as 0:2010cv61721
Plaintiff:
Jose E Lozano
Defendant:
Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
USA v. Jose Lozano-Escobedo
as 09-10473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE CIPRIANO LOZANO-ESCOBEDO
Lozano v. Fogarty et al
as 5:2009cv05098
Plaintiff:
Jose "ED" Lozano
Defendant:
Kathryn R. Fogarty, Eric K. Shinseki and United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lozano v. Curry
as 4:2009cv01461
Petitioner:
Jose A. Lozano
Respondent:
Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lozano et al v. Ampro Mortgage Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Lozano, Bibiana Huizar and Luis A. Lopez
Defendant:
Ampro Mortgage Corp., Recontrust Company and Recontrust Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Rivera-Lozano
as 08-20741
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS RIVERA-LOZANO, also known as Jose Luis Rivera, also known as Jose Rivera-Lozano, also known as Mario Benitez, also known as Anthony Uvalde
Finn et al v. Lozano et al
as 5:2008cv01219
Plaintiff:
David M Finn and Judy L Finn
Defendant:
Jose Angel Lozano, Cesar Edgardo Loyola, Del Llano Transport Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Perkins v. Wardy et al
as 3:2008cv00395
Plaintiff:
Horace Perkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Joe Wardy, Susan Austin, Jose A. Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jose Lozano Arredondo v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-73835
Petitioner:
JOSE GUADALUPE LOZANO ARREDONDO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Perea et al v. C & D Security, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00540
Plaintiff:
Chris Perea, Chris Perea, Luis Acosta and others
Defendant:
C & D Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
