Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv02214
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. DIAZ
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Diaz et al v. Ferreira Paz et al
as 3:2023cv02205
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Diaz and Franchesca Moreno
Defendant:
Jose Ferreira Paz and Logistic Industries LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv23290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abel Contreras et al v. XPO Cartage, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05725
Plaintiff:
Abimael Hernandez, Jose F. Castro, Manuel D. Martinez Mejia and others
Defendant:
XPO Port Services, Inc., XPO Logistics, Inc., XPO Logistics Port Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Colon et al v. G4S PLC et al
as 2:2017cv14100
Plaintiff:
Angel Colon , Amneris Diaz , Rodney Sumter and others
Defendant:
G4S PLC, G4S Secure Solutions and Noor Salman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. The City of Sweetwater et al
as 1:2017cv20414
Plaintiff:
Jorge Gonzalez
Defendant:
The City of Sweetwater and Jose M. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. et al v. DIAZ-CHAVEZ
as 1:2016cv00969
Defendant:
JOSE M DIAZ-CHAVEZ and DON MARCOS INC
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite Comm.
Pichardo v. City of Sweetwater et al
as 1:2015cv24069
Plaintiff:
Richardo Pichardo
Defendant:
City of Sweetwater and Jose M. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cuevas v. City of Sweetwater et al
as 1:2015cv22785
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cuevas and JLC Group
Defendant:
City of Sweetwater and Jose M. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. Jose Diaz
as 13-1122
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jose M. Diaz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
