Cases 21 - 30 of 1,045
Jose Ramos-Cruz, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1104
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL RAMOS-CRUZ, BIANA AMERICA GIRON-BARRERA DE RAMOS, A. C. R.-G. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Beltran v. Marion County Sheriff Department
as 6:2023cv01912
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Beltran
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff Department, Deputy Frieze, Deputy Kevin Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. A&I General Contractors LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09131
Plaintiff:
Abimael Garcia, Jabel Osmany Arauz Rochez, Jaime Trinidad Del Carmen and others
Defendant:
A&I General Contractors LLC, RCD Restorations Inc., APS Construction Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
United States of America v. Perez
as 23-3861
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL PEREZ
USA v. Jose Gonzalez-Ibarra
as 23-13823
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL GONZALEZ-IBARRA
Peinado v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Peinado
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vargas v. United States Border Patrol-Customs and Border Protection et al
as 3:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Vargas
Defendant:
United States Border Patrol-Customs and Border Protection, United States Border Patrol Supervisor and United States Border Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
