Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jody Marquez v. Corizon Health Services, et al
as 17-15601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JODY JOSE MARQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, Health Care Contractor, LEE MALANCHINSKI, Dr./ Corizon's ASPC-Lewis Managing Physician, LAWRENCE ENDE, Nurse Practitioner at ASPC-Lewis and others
Marquez v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01294
Plaintiff:
Jose Marquez
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquez #141485 v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 2:2014cv02175
Plaintiff:
Jody Jose Marquez
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Lee Malanchinski, Lawrence Ende and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jose Marquez
as 14-51105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MARQUEZ
Marquez v. United States Of America
as 6:2013cv00215
Petitioner:
Jose Marquez, .
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MENDEZ v. HOLDER
as 2:2012cv04021
Petitioner:
JOSE MARQUEZ MENDEZ
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marquez-Arias v. USA
as 4:2009cv00359
Petitioner:
Jose Marquez-Arias
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dawson v. Egelhoff, et al
as 08-1405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN F. EGELHOFF, ROBERT MCGAHEY, JOANN L. VOGT and others
Dawson v. Egelhoff et al
as 1:2008cv01976
Plaintiff:
James Ralph Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin (I) Egelhoff, Martin Egelhoff, Robert (I) McGahey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jody Marquez v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 08-16225
Petitioner - Appellant:
JODY JOSE MARQUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director Arizona Department Correction and TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
