Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Nunez et al v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2016cv22124
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Acosta Vega, Jr., Carlos Alvarez, Fernando Antonetti and others
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Palaguachi et al v. Tsimoyianis et al
as 1:2015cv09688
Defendant:
George Tsimoyianis , All City Remodeling, Inc. , T&G Contracting Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Palaguachi , Daniel Galdame , Marco Morocho and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cruz-Vasquez et al v. Sanders Farms, Inc et al
as 6:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
Oswaldo Cruz-Vasquez , Lazaro Faustino Cruz-Alday , Jorge Cruz-Rios and others
Defendant:
Sanders Farms, Inc, Sanders Brothers, LLC and Bartolo L. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Montes v. Capra
as 1:2015cv02229
Petitioner:
Jose Montes
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOLANO v. ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS, CORP
as 1:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
JOSE MONTES SOLANO
Defendant:
ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Montes v. Timekeepers, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jose Montes, Jr.
Defendant:
Timekeepers, Inc., Tier One Security, Inc., Rabbit Ear Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01846
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cruz et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-12804
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Cruz and Jose Montes
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cruz et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv12804
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Cruz and Jose Montes
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
