Cases 81 - 90 of 767
Rodriguez v. Bradey et al
as 3:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
Bradey, McGunndy, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Target Corporation
as 1:2022cv02982
Plaintiff:
Michael D Braun, Jose Rodriguez and Sherri Morris
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Lang Pharma Nutrition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
USA v. Rodriguez-Silva
as 22-50223
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Rodriguez-Silva, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rodriguez Rodriguez v. Turbo Home Services, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
Pedro Jose Rodriguez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Turbo Home Services, LLC, William Gomez and Felix Gomez
United States of America v. Burrell (Durell Guy)
as 22-421
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nico Burrell, AKA Zico Nico, Douglas McLarty, AKA Q-Don, AKA Q-Dizzy, Gerard Bass, AKA Roddo and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Durell Guy
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jose Rodriguez v. Carrie Hutchinson et al
as 2:2022cv00683
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
Carrie Hutchinson, 1-10 DOES and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Rodriguez-Rohena et al v. Garza et al
as 1:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez-Rohena and Cassy Quiroa
Defendant:
Damian Garza and Ismael-Eva Garza
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
