Cases 1 - 10 of 24
RODRIGUEZ-CHAVEZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv07343
Petitioner:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ-CHAVEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RODRIGUEZ-ORTIZ v. H.P. SERVICES, CORP.
as 2:2021cv11509
Plaintiff:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ-ORTIZ
Defendant:
H.P. SERVICES, CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
VASADI et al v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2021cv10238
Plaintiff:
SCOTT TEITSCH, DANIELLE MOYER, JEAN VASADI and others
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
MANENTE et al v. APPLE INC. et al
as 2:2020cv15601
Defendant:
APPLE INC., JOSE RODRIGUEZ, STAPLES and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS MANENTE and ASHLEY LEBRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRUZ v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2019cv20906
Defendant:
DET. DANIEL CHOE, PROSECUTORS OFFICE, DET. JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIAR ROJAS CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUBON v. SPAIN INN, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00452
Defendant:
SPAIN INN, INC., LUIS RODRIGUEZ and JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DUBON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WORTMANN et al v. LIVINGSTON AUTO WASH, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv16128
Plaintiff:
MARK WORTMANN and JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
LIVINGSTON AUTO WASH, INC., MORRISTOWN CAR WASH, LLC and PAUL RITTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13030
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
POTTER et al v. NEWKIRK et al
as 1:2017cv08478
Plaintiff:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toxqui v. Spain Inn, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02783
Plaintiff:
Jose Toxqui
Defendant:
Spain Inn, Inc., Luis Rodriguez and Jose Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
