Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Garcia et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Abel Garcia and Leonardo Martinez
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Christopher Papaionnou, Dante Koeppen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Sandoval v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01145
Petitioner:
Jose Sandoval
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sandoval v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Damaris Jose Sandoval
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Not Classified By Court:
Curt Truitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sandoval Argueta v. Garland
as 23-60080
Petitioner:
Erick Jose Sandoval Argueta
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Kevin Y. Jin et al v. Rafael Velasquez et al
as 5:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Kevin Y. Jin, Mary H. Lim and L.J.
Defendant:
Rafael Velasquez, Juan Jose Gonzalez, Juan Jose Sandoval Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SANDOVAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54251
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANDOVAL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandoval v. D.&J., Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00194
Defendant:
D.&J., Enterprises, Inc. and Anthony Burdick
Plaintiff:
Jose Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
