Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kern et al v. Stubhub, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Lowell Kern and Joseph Ball
Defendant:
Stubhub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Salinas, Jose v. Wilfrid, Brett et al
as 3:2019cv00850
Defendant:
Brett N. Wilfrid and Joseph Balls
Plaintiff:
Jose Salinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv03583
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Roderick Flowers v. Noble Wray, et al
as 12-1493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK V. FLOWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
NOBLE WRAY, Personally and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Madison Police Department, JOSEPH BALLES, Personally and in his official capacity as Police Captain, Madison Police Department, MARIBETH WITZEL-BEHL, Personally and in her official capacity as City Clerk, City of Madison, Wisconsin and others
Joseph Ball v. Francisco Quintana, et al
as 11-4125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, ATTY GEN PA and DA PHILADELPHIA
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01161
Defendant:
Ed, Mr. Acevado, S. Afhook and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01160
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
Don Arnold, Joseph Ball, Michelle Cale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Ball
as 2:2011mj30263
Defendant:
James Joseph Ball
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Ball
as 2:2011mj30263
Defendant:
James Joseph Ball
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Flowers, Roderick v. Wray, Noble et al
as 3:2010cv00785
Plaintiff:
Roderick V. Flowers
Defendant:
Noble Wray, Joseph Balles, Maribeth Witzel-Behl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
