Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Schmit et al v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv04664
Plaintiff:
Heathermarie Conway, Randy L. Ireland, Mark Chronowitz and others
Defendant:
Ed Cox, Henry T. Berger, Peter S. Kosinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv04396
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Joseph Larkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Summerfield, Jr. et al
as 2:2021cv00895
Defendant:
Paul R. Summerfield, Sr., Joseph Larkins and Paul Summerfield, Jr. individually doing business as PSummerfield Construction
Plaintiff:
SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PELLE v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2017cv04623
Plaintiff:
TODD PELLE
Defendant:
R. PEREZ, JOSEPH LARKINS, ANTHONY CANCEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNNINGTON v. LARKINS et al
as 2:2015cv05071
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. DUNNINGTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH LARKINS and A CANCEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Stonington et al
as 3:2013cv00737
Plaintiff:
Carol F. Holt
Defendant:
Town of Stonington and Joseph Larkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holt v. Zoning Board of Appeal
as 12-4878
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Carol Holt
Defendant:
Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Stonington, Planning & Zoning Commission, Town of Stonington and Joseph Larkin, Zoning Enforcement Officer of Town of Stonington
Defendant - Appellant:
Town of Stonington
Holt v. Stonington et al
as 3:2009cv02069
Plaintiff:
Carol F. Holt
Defendant:
Town of Stonington, Zoning Board Of Appeals, Planning & Zoning Comm and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Betar v. Blue et al
as 4:2007cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gaylon Lee Betar
Defendant:
Joe Blue, Mike Lewis, Joseph Larkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
