Cases 31 - 40 of 49
ROMANO et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02986
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ROMANO and JOAN ROMANO
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Romano v. USA
as 2:2016cv00893
Petitioner:
Joseph Romano
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Romano v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00305
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Joseph Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mutual First, LLC v. Romano
as 1:2014cv23070
Plaintiff:
Mutual First, LLC
Defendant:
Louis Joseph Romano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stote, et al v. Umass Correctional Health Care, et al
as 14-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. STOTE
:
JAMES CYR and JOSE SIME
Plaintiff:
WAYNE D. CROSBY, TERRY CARTER, ENEZ KOLENVOVIC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UMASS MEDICAL SCHOOL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Romano v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12684
Plaintiff:
Joseph Romano
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Romano
as 14-1588
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dejvid Mirkovic, AKA Dave Mirkovic, AKA David Mirkovic, AKA Dejuid Mirkovic
Defendant - Appellant:
Joseph Romano
In re: Joseph Romano
as 14-11208
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH ROMANO
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Romano v. United States of America
as 1:2013mc01105
Petitioner:
Joseph Romano
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
