Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Lawson v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Josh Lawson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garzon v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Josh Garzon
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Wahl et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandako, Inc and others
Defendant:
John Wahl, John Skipper, Sallie Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolar et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00568
Plaintiff:
Josh Tolar, Rusty Taylor, Gary Dillard and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Farm Service Agency and United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hatten v. Chadwick et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv00998
Defendant:
John Crawford, Michael Chadwick, Cody Evan and others
Plaintiff:
Quincey Hatten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivie v. Jackson et al
as 1:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Kyle Ethridge, Byron Caylor, Aaron McCullough and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Faye Ivie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. J&J Poultry, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin Yates
Defendant:
J&J Poultry, LLC and Josh Parmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00667
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Melvin v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00083
Defendant:
David Sutton, State of Alabama, Lee Holley and others
Plaintiff:
Shadey Bron Melvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
