Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Wilder v. US Attorney General et al
as 7:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Ben Stein, Oners of 201 - 414 North 11th Street Wilmington NC 28401, New Hanover County NC Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence V. Wilder, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CLINTON v. STEIN
as 1:2021cv00224
Respondent:
JOSH STEIN
Petitioner:
REGINALD DEVORE CLINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARROYO et al v. SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant:
SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, LUZ GORDON, CITY OF CONCORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brunson v. Stein et al
as 5:2021ct03063
Defendant:
Yolanda K. Stith, Emily M. Baucom, James C. Gillen and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Eugene Brunson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grabarczyk v. Stein et al
as 5:2021cv00094
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kenneth Grabarczyk
Defendant:
Bob Schurmeier, Josh Stein, Sean Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Stein
as 5:2021hc02041
Petitioner:
Casey Rafael Tyler
Respondent:
Josh Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Schnebelen v. Erik Hooks
as 21-6209
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID SCHNEBELEN
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSH STEIN, North Carolina Attorney General, MIKE SLAGLE, Mountain View CI Superintendent and ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary of Department of Public Safety, this respondent was initially named as other Kenneth Beaver
Felix v. Doughtie et al
as 2:2021cv00007
Defendant:
Doug Doughtie, Rob Ross, Dare County, North Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Felix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSBY v. STEIN et al
as 1:2021cv00072
Respondent:
THE CORPORATE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and JOSH STEIN
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MOSBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
C. Mosbey v. Josh Stein
as 21-6061
Respondent / Appellee:
THE CORPORATE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and JOSH STEIN
Petitioner / Appellant:
C. JOSEPH MOSBEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
