Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Judd vs Powel, et al
as 3:2026cv00708
Petitioner:
Kody Lee Judd
Respondent:
Ryan Powel and Stephen B. Rye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Inaru v. Judd et al
as 8:2026cv02524
Plaintiff:
Tureygua Inaru
Defendant:
Sheriff Grady Judd, Officer Wilson and Officers Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gazzola v. State of Florida et al
as 9:2026cv80980
Plaintiff:
John Gazzola
Defendant:
State of Florida, Theresa Matteson, Theresa Trippardella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Judd et al
as 8:2026cv02317
Plaintiff:
Sandy Antonio Moore
Defendant:
Sheriff Grady Curtis Judd, Deputy MICHAEL ALEXANDER PIENKOWSKI and Polk County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jeznach v. Judd et al
as 8:2026cv02158
Plaintiff:
Loretta Jeznach, Loretta Collins and Loretta Lay
Defendant:
Sheriff Grady Judd, Jane Doe, I and Jane Doe, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe v. Wesley Dunlap
as 26-1996
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
WESLEY DUNLAP, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, d/b/a Russel County Public Schools, PHIL JUDD, individually and as an agent of Rockingham County School Board and others
Inaru v. Judd et al
as 8:2026cv02174
Plaintiff:
Tureygua Inaru
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Deputy #7546 and FNU Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Judd et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2026cv07365
Plaintiff:
David Judd and Patricia Ann Judd
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Buckner v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00068
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Judd Buckner
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clarke v. Lyons et al
as 8:2026cv01967
Plaintiff:
HARSHA FARRON CLARKE
Defendant:
NICOLE LYONS and GRADY JUDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
