Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dyllan Rives, et al v. University of Tennessee, et al
as 24-5336
Plaintiff:
DYLLAN RIVES and JAMES R. RIVES
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, DONDE PLOWMAN, Individually and as Chancellor, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE and others
Rives et al v. University of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Dyllan Rives and James R Rives
Defendant:
University of Tennessee, Donde Plowman, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Billups v. Cammack et al
as 1:2022cv03507
Defendant:
H. Cunningham, Cody Cammack, Jeffrey Juergens and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Atlas Billups
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sapien v. Torres et al
as 3:2021cv00099
Defendant:
Blanca Burgemeister, Janine Torres, Juergen Burgemeister and others
Plaintiff:
Farid Sapien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brunke v. Rodegra
as 1:2019cv02266
Plaintiff:
Lothar Brunke
Defendant:
Dr. Juergen Rodegra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Brunke v. Rodegra
as 1:2019cv00283
Plaintiff:
Lothar Brunke
Defendant:
Rodegra Juergen and Dr. Juergen Rodegra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Husain v. Springer
as 13-1408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sarah Husain, Devon Blinth, Colleen McGraham and others
Respondent - Appellee:
NYS Attorney General
Defendant - Appellee:
Marlene Springer, Carol Jackson, Kathleen Galvez and others
Intervenor:
Iman El-Sayed and Renee Marhong
Gedo v. Sevison et al
as 2:2008cv00438
Plaintiff:
Miguel David Gedo
Defendant:
Alan B. Sevison, Charlene Begay, Bill Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
