Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Richards et al v. EQT Production Company
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Arnold K. Richards and Mary L. Richards
Defendant:
EQT Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Richards et al
as 2:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Sean D Anderson
Defendant:
Allen K Richards, Seattle Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Lewis et al
as 5:2016cv01326
Plaintiff:
Joe K Richards
Defendant:
FNU Lewis, Robert Schulte and Steve Lyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Malone v. Cleveland Community Dev, et al
as 16-3682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY MALONE
Defendant - Appellee:
CLEVELAND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, MARY SMITH, DEANNA K. RICHARDS and others
Malone v. Cleveland Dept. of Community Development et al
as 1:2016cv00531
Plaintiff:
Johnny Malone
Defendant:
Cleveland Dept. of Community Development, Mary Smith, Deanna K Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Production Management Industries L L C
as 6:2015cv02567
Plaintiff:
LaPatrick Daniels , Kirt Favors , Clyde Castle and others
Defendant:
Production Management Industries L L C
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Antonio Richard
as 15-14243
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO K. RICHARD
Richards v. Fallin et al
as 5:2015cv00858
Petitioner:
Joe K Richards
Respondent:
Mary Fallin and William Monday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richards et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02649
Plaintiff:
William K. Richards and Carol D. Richards
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard v. Andrew et al
as 9:2015cv00063
Petitioner:
Cyril K. Richard
Respondent:
Boyd Andrew and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
