Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Oliver v. Michaud, et al
as 23-1840
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW H. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, DOUGLAS H. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity and others
(PC) Robinson v. Acuna
as 2:2023cv02284
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Alexander Acuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
In Re: Oliver
as 23-1184
Petitioner:
THOMAS OLIVER
Respondent:
JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, MATTHEW H. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, DOUGLAS H. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity and others
(PC) Robinson v. Scottini
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Scottini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Michaud, et al.
as 1:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oliver
Defendant:
Joseph L. Michaud, Matthew H. Michaud, Douglas H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
(PC) Robinson v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv01717
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Ty Jones and Alexander Acuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv05374
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Ty Jones and Alexander Acuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Robinson v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Ty Jones and Alexander Acuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Robinson v. Scottini
as 2:2022cv01641
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Scottini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
