Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Smith v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv01139
Petitioner:
Cruise K Smith
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Levonzel Anderson v. Management Training Corp., et al
as 20-60342
Defendant / Appellee:
MANAGEMENT TRAINING CORPORATION, ("MTC"), Individual Capacity, DEPUTY WARDEN GABRIEL WALKER, Official Capacity and Individual Capacity, WARDEN JODY BRADLEY, Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVONZEL ANDERSON
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00204
Petitioner:
Cruise K Smith
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burgess v. Nino et al
as 1:2020cv00102
Defendant:
FNU Nino, K. Smith and FNU Williams
Plaintiff:
Chris Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2020cv00824
Plaintiff:
Chevroun K Smith
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rasheed v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Anthony G. Beasley, Joshua Csaszar, Andrew C. Mills and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Akeem Abdullah Rasheed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penigar v. Glassel et al
as 4:2019cv04191
Defendant:
Lt. Stone, Cpt. Mohammed Touhami, RN Boyce and others
Plaintiff:
Pieron D. Penigar and Kieron Derek Penigar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Outdoor Management Displays, LLC, John Does 1-5, William K. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa K. Walker, Walker Media, LLC and Michael Clinton Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv11856
Plaintiff:
Linda K Smith and Linda Smith
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. 3M Company
as 6:2019cv00070
Plaintiff:
Joshua K. Smith
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
