Cases 1 - 10 of 18
John Stuart v. Sherry Stephens, et al
as 22-16722
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN C. STUART
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERRY K. STEPHENS, STATE OF ARIZONA, KEITH MUNSON and others
Stuart v. Stephens et al
as 2:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
John C Stuart
Defendant:
Sherry K Stephens, Keith Munson and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Stephens et al
as 3:2020cv00727
Defendant:
K. Stephens, Warden Unknown Nash, S. Baymon-Allen and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Tony M. Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2019cv00249
Petitioner:
Mr. John K Stephens and John K. Stephens
Respondent:
Mr. Tim Shoop and Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2019cv04809
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Richard L Nothwehr, Dewain D Fox and others
Plaintiff:
William Lee Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPHENS v. WARDEN
as 1:2019cv00084
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
LONNIE K. STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ingersoll v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01685
Defendant:
Mr. Kotey, D. Rains, Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ingersoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingersoll v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01321
Defendant:
. Kotey, . Ritz, D. Rains and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ingersoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingersoll v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03064
Plaintiff:
Robert Ingersoll
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., D. Rains, . Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00684
Plaintiff:
Celso K Stephens
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, FNU LNU, Jerry Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
