Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Harris v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (MAG+)
as 2:2021cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Lee Harris
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, D. Whitley, Captain Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Thomas et al
as 1:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Theresa K. Thomas and Kevin N. Thomas
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Campbell v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
Taywan Dewayne Campbell
Defendant:
Ventress Correctional Facility, Alabama Department of Corrections, T. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Governor State of Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2019cv00436
Defendant:
Governor State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Adrian K. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Rahming et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00470
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Rahming , V. Lockhart , Desiree Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Thomas
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn , Phyllis Billups , Warden Bolling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Billups et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00375
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Thomas
Defendant:
Phyllis Billups and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Goldsmith et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00163
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Thomas
Defendant:
R. Goldsmith, H. Ruffin, T. Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Goldsmith et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2014cv00163
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Thomas
Defendant:
R. Goldsmith, H. Ruffin, T. Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Pfizer, Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00953
Plaintiff:
Lawana K Thomas , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
