Cases 1 - 10 of 340
Landry v. Rhode Island State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Defendant:
Ana Cristina Cola, Rhode Island State Police, Lt. R. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Norman J. Landry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Barth v. Town of Waterboro, et al
as 24-1170
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant:
TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB, SAMUEL G. JOHNSON and others
Vose v. Kilmartin, et al
as 24-1066
Plaintiff:
CARLTON VOSE
Defendant:
PETER F. KILMARTIN, GERALD J. COYNE, PATRICIA K. ROCHA and others
Pinney v. City of Cambridge, et al
as 23-2075
Plaintiff:
GITAPUSHY VAL ANGEL and JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
CAMBRIDGE, MA and HEIDI MAE WEILMUENSTER
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Brown-Allen et al v. DeFelice Management
as 1:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Latoya Brown-Allen and Andrew K. Harding
Defendant:
DeFelice Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Youngman et al v. C.
as 1:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Maria Youngman and Hodges Apartment Complex
Defendant:
K. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Howard v. Bisenius et al
as 1:2023cv12176
Plaintiff:
David Howard
Defendant:
Theresa A Bisenius, Jennifer M Ulwick, Mary Rudolph Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
