Cases 21 - 30 of 27,367
Rodney Winchester v. David Gladieux, et al
as 24-1687
Plaintiff:
RODNEY K. WINCHESTER
Defendant:
DAVID GLADIEUX, KAREN RICHARDS and ANY UNNAMED UNKNOWN POLICY MAKER
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Greenhill v. Nordstrom Rack et al
as 1:2024cv03150
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel K. Greenhill
Defendant:
Nordstrom Rack, Anthony Garcia, Rickey Agyemang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kamara #331657 v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv08074
Plaintiff:
Elijah Joseph Kamara
Defendant:
Unknown Richardson, Edward Jones, GEO Medical Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Glenn Cook
Defendant:
USA, Dr. R. Pass, L. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
C.O. MS. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cash v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Nathan K Cash
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rehart v. TDCJ
as 24-10354
Plaintiff:
Steven G. Rehart
Defendant:
TDCJ, Danny C. Diaz, Cellmate at TDCJ, OIfficer FNU Blackshire, Officer at TDCJ and others
CHENG v. BYRD et al
as 1:2024cv05345
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
K. BYRD, JAMES A. GIBBS, THOMAS J. GUBBIOTTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
