Cases 21 - 30 of 1,292
Taylor v. Blount County Jail
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
James K. Taylor
Defendant:
Blount County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janous v. Aramark Corporation
as 3:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Frank Donald Janous
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation a/k/a Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Corporation and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Boykins et al
as 2:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Johnson
Defendant:
K. Boykins, Off. Bailey, D.R.T. Off. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02789
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, K. Fields, Shelby County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whyte v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ricardo Whyte
Defendant:
Brenna K. Bell, Jennings H, Jones, Donna Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Obion County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Bryan K Watkins
Defendant:
Obion County Jail and Jennifer Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Clinton v. Harrison
as 2:2023cv02754
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Clinton
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rudd v. Mays
as 2:2023cv02721
Plaintiff:
Latanua K. Rudd
Defendant:
Samuel H. Mays, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
