Cases 51 - 60 of 141,271
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Scanlon v. Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Scanlon
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wilson v. Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Robin Wilson
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Accord Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gaines v. Alameda County Santa Rita Jail et al
as 1:2024cv02514
Plaintiff:
Jacobi Gaines
Defendant:
Alameda County Santa Rita Jail, K. De La Fuente and Karl Greigore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leigh v. Sims et al
as 5:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Chad K Leigh
Defendant:
Jerry Sims, Jr and Teamsters Local Union 886
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
US v. Ronald Jenkins, Jr.
as 24-4220
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RONALD DAMONE JENKINS, JR., a/k/a G, a/k/a GG, a/k/a Gee, a/k/a Gee Gee
US v. Japree Brooks
as 24-4221
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAPREE LORTEZ BROOKS, a/k/a Choppa, a/k/a Khoppa, a/k/a Primo
US v. Thomas Palmer
as 24-4222
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS WELDON PALMER, a/k/a Flame, a/k/a Jynx, a/k/a Jynx Da Don
US v. Jamique Mays
as 24-4223
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMIQUE MAYS, a/k/a Eye Tunes
Barajas Galvan, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2632
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO JAVIER BARAJAS GALVAN and YESENIA ALCALA VELAZQUEZ
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
