Cases 1 - 10 of 100
United States of America v. Kaplan
as 26-2560
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL KAPLAN and ADAM KAPLAN
In re: Nicholas Purpura
as 26-3260
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS E. PURPURA
Respondent:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, & CO., JAMES DIMON, DEAN COOPER and others
United States of America v. Kaplan
as 26-2463
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ADAM KAPLAN and DANIEL KAPLAN
Appellant:
STEWART KAPLAN, surety and IDIDA KAPLAN, surety
United States of America v. Kaplan
as 26-2464
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL KAPLAN and ADAM KAPLAN
Interested Party:
IDIDA KAPLAN and STEWART KAPLAN
Farina et al v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2026cv10875
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, bank of new york as trustee, ESQ. MICHAEL B. KAPLAN and others
Plaintiff:
EMILIO FARINA and Edith Farina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra
Aunt Bertha v. NLRB
as 26-10752
Plaintiff:
Aunt Bertha, doing business as Findhelp
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board, a federal administrative agency, Jennifer Abruzzo, in her official capacity as the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, Lauren McFerran, in her official capacity as the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board and others
Brennan v. Kaplan North America, LLC
as 0:2026cv62279
Plaintiff:
Michael Brennan
Defendant:
Kaplan North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv10203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedures Act
Kaplan v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 3:2026cv08245
Plaintiff:
Yensi Beatriz Kaplan
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
