Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Ortiz v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Cindy Ortiz
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of, Henry Topps, Joshua Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphrey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00025
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Askew v. Straw et al
as 4:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Charles Askew
Defendant:
Cheryle Askew, Lamont Straw, Keith Humphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphrey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00025
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphrey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franke et al v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2020cv01310
Plaintiff:
Sherry Franke and Kalob Franke
Defendant:
The Municiapal League Vehicle Program, John Does, Devon Colclough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphrey v. Fulk et al
as 4:2020cv01158
Defendant:
Michael McVay, Motorola Solutions doing business as Watchguard, Shella Atlas-Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron et al v. Humphrey et al
as 4:2020cv00506
Defendant:
Zebulun J Tyler, Steve Pledger, Francisco June Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Shawny Woods, Tonya Estelle, Fernando Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
