Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PETTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv02852
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH PETTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00956
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KEITH PETTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03065
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CHRASTKA, KEITH PETTY, EUGENE ROBERSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02036
Plaintiff:
Matthew Chrastka, Keith Petty, Eugene Roberson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pettis v. U.S. Bank, NA
as 1:2014cv05729
Plaintiff:
Keith Pettis
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
James Graham v. Wells Fargo Bank of Ozark, et al
as 13-13257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BRYSON GRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
WALLACE DAVIS MALONE, III, WILLIAM C. CARN, III, JOE GODWIN and others
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK OF OZARK
Graham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al (MAG+)
as 1:2012cv01034
Plaintiff:
James Bryson Graham
Defendant:
W. Davis Malone, III , William C. Carn , Joe Godwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant:
United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant et al v. Parker et al
as 2:2007cv00717
Plaintiff:
Nancy Jo Grant, Adeline Hudson and Johnnie Henry Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
James S. Parker, Vernon L. Keen, Donald Hartery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Antitrust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv04572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
