Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Teamsters of Local Union No. 5, et al v. The Kellogg Sales Company
as 12-3820
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEAMSTERS OF LOCAL UNION NO. 52 and TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 926
Defendant / Appellee:
THE KELLOGG SALES COMPANY
Teamsters of Local Union No. 5, et al v. The Kellogg Sales Company
as 12-3820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEAMSTERS OF LOCAL UNION NO. 52 and TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 926
Defendant - Appellee:
THE KELLOGG SALES COMPANY
Teamsters Local Union No. 52 et al v. The Kellogg Sales Company
as 1:2012cv01632
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local Union No. 926 and Teamsters Local Union No. 52
Defendant:
The Kellogg Sales Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Tillman v. Kellogg Company et al
as 4:2011cv00226
Plaintiff:
Shirley A. Tillman
Defendant:
Kellogg Company , Kellogg Sales Company and Gregory McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S & S Sales Inc v. Kellogg Company et al
as 2:2011cv00155
Plaintiff:
S & S Sales Inc
Defendant:
Kellogg Company, Kellogg Sales Company, Kellogg USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lowy v. Kellogg Sales Company
as 2:2011cv00641
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Lowy
Defendant:
Kellogg Sales Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vallee et al v. Carolina Handling, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00167
Plaintiff:
Michael David Vallee and Rebecca Lynn Vallee
Defendant:
Carolina Handling, LLC , Kellogg Sales Company and The Raymond Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Earley v. Kellogg Company et al
as 1:2010cv00772
Plaintiff:
Mark Earley
Defendant:
Kellogg Company , Kellogg Sales Company and Kellogg USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
